1Wagle WA, Smith M. Tattoo-induced skin burn during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174(6): 1795. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741795
2Kreidstein ML, Giguere D, Freiberg A. MRI interaction with tattoo pigments: case report, pathophysiology, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99(6): 1717-1720.
3Franiel T, Schmidt S, Klingebiel R. First-degree burns on MRI due to nonferrous tattoos. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5): W556. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.5082
4Ross JR, Matava MJ. Tattoo-induced skin “burn” during magnetic resonance imaging in a professional football player: a case report. Sports Health. 2011; 3(5): 431-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111411698
5Lohner V, Enkirch SJ, Hattingen E, Stöcker T, Breteler MMB. Safety of tattoos, permanent make-up, and medical implants in population-based 3T magnetic resonance brain imaging: the Rhineland Study. Front Neurol. 2022; 13:795573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.795573
6Callaghan MF, Negus C, Leff AP, et al. Safety of tattoos in persons undergoing MRI [letter to the editor]. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(5): 495-496. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1811197
7Serup J, Alsing KK, Olsen O, Koch CB, Hansen RH. On the mechanism of painful burn sensation in tattoos on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Magnetic substances in tattoo inks used for permanent makeup (PMU) identified: magnetite, goethite, and hematite. Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(3):e13281. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13281
8 ACR Committee on MR Safety. ACR Manual on MR Safety. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2020.
9Wang JF, Hindman NM. Prevention of thermal burns from magnetic resonance imaging in patients with tattoos. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 80(5): e101-e102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.011
10 Guideline for minimally invasive surgery. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2023: 529-566.

REFERENCES

1 Guideline for minimally invasive surgery. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2023: 529-566.
2Schuessler Z, Scott Stiles A, Mancuso P. Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic-assisted surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29(1-2): 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15053
3Almeras C, Almeras C. Operating room communication in robotic surgery: place, modalities and evolution of a safe system of interaction. J Visc Surg. 2019; 156(5): 397-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.02.004
4Schiff L, Tsafrir Z, Aoun J, Taylor A, Theoharis E, Eisenstein D. Quality of communication in robotic surgery and surgical outcomes. JSLS. 2016; 20(3):e2016.00026. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00026
5Randell R, Honey S, Hindmarsh J, et al. A realist process evaluation of robot-assisted surgery: integration into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration and decision-making. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2017; 5(20). https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05200
6Myklebust MV, Storheim H, Hartvik M, Dysvik E. Anesthesia professionals’ perspectives of teamwork during robotic-assisted surgery. AORN J. 2020; 111(1): 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12897
7Sexton K, Johnson A, Gotsch A, Hussein AA, Cavuoto L, Guru KA. Anticipation, teamwork, and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27(2): 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006701
8Weigl M, Weber J, Hallett E, et al. Associations of intraoperative flow disruptions and operating room teamwork during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2018; 114: 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.060
9Allers JC, Hussein AA, Ahmad N, et al. Evaluation and impact of workflow interruptions during robot-assisted surgery. Urology. 2016; 92: 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.040
10 Sentinel Event Data 2022 Annual Review. The Joint Commission. Accessed June 16, 2023. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/sentinel-event/03162023_sentinel-event-_annual-review_final-(002).pdf
11Raheem S, Ahmed YE, Hussein AA, et al. Variability and interpretation of communication taxonomy during robot-assisted surgery: do we all speak the same language? BJU Int. 2018; 122(1): 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14150
12 Guideline for team communication. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2023: 1153-1184.
13Song JB, Vemana G, Mobley JM, Bhayani SB. The second “time-out”: a surgical safety checklist for lengthy robotic surgeries. Patient Saf Surg. 2013; 7: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-7-19
14Mathew R, Markey K, Murphy J, Brien BO’. Integrative literature review examining factors affecting patient safety with robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgeries. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018; 50(6): 645-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12437

Volume118, Issue4

Special Focus Issue: Infection Prevention

October 2023

Pages 267-272

Journal list menu

Tools

Follow journal

Clinical Issues — October 2023

THIS MONTH

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

References

Information

RESOURCES

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Journal list menu

Tools

Follow journal

Clinical Issues — October 2023

THIS MONTH

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

References

Related

Information

RESOURCES